The First American Book of Common Prayer.
What is the major issue for biblically-minded conservatives in the ECUSA?
People who deem themselves to be conservative and/or traditional in
theology and morality and are involved to some degree in the life of the
Episcopal Church, U.S.A., feel that much is wrong with their Church. And
they tend to focus upon one or two "presenting issues/problems" in order to
point to what the wrong is, and where it is expressed. Such "presenting
problems" can be, and perhaps should be, viewed (to change the metaphor) as
the tip of the iceberg.
- 1. Beginning in the years after the Second World War, and gaining momentum
in the 1970's after the revision of Canon Law, was the issue of marriage
and whether the Church ought to be more liberal in its acceptance of second
and third marriages for divorcees. For some then and now the relaxation of
marriage discipline in the Church, and especially the allowing of divorced
& remarried priests to remain as pastors [1/4 of the whole], was the
opening of the door wide to the use of situation ethics and to a secular
morality including that of active homosexuality.
- 2. After the illegal ordination of women in Philadelphia in 1973 and then
the acceptance of this innovation in 1976 by the General Convention , the
issue arose as to whether the modern Church has the authority to change the
received polity, tradition and practice of the catholic Church through
space and time to the present. Today there is still a minority within the
ECUSA which focuses primarily on this issue as the key to what is wrong
with the Episcopal Church -- as the existence and vitality of the E.S.A.
(now F.in F.) witnesses.
- 3. In 1976/1979, after a decade of experimentation and trial use the
General Convention authorized a new prayer book for the ECUSA. In doing so
it did not call it by the name that similar publications were to be given
in other Anglican Churches (e.g. An Alternative Service Book or An
Australian/South African Prayer Book) but rather used the traditional name
of the classic, historical prayer book of the Anglican family, The Book of
Common Prayer, for it (thus not telling the truth). This setting aside of
the old Book and the persecution of those committed to its continued use,
together with the imposition of the new Book, was a major issue for many in
the 1970's and remains a major issue for a minority to this day - as the
continued existence and vitality of the Prayer Book Society witnesses.
- 4. After the publication of the 1979 prayer book, the Standing Liturgical
Commission continued to publish trial services and rites and, as the years
went by, so did their radical nature become more obvious. And this was
most apparent in the commitment to what has been called non-excluding,
inclusive and embracing language both for humankind and for Deity. Thus
the use of such names as "the Father" "the Son" "the Lord" and "the King"
have diminished and the use of either neutral or feminine name and images
has increased. Further the sinfulness of mankind and the sacrificial
Atonement of the Lord Jesus have been negated. For some people this change
of language points to a change of doctrine and religion and is therefore a
very major issue.
- 5. Increasingly over the last decade of the second millennium, the
ordaining of actively homosexual men and women has gained momentum, as also
has the public "marriage" in church of same-sex couples. As all this is
presented by its advocates in terms of human rights based upon biological
and psychological human make-up, it is gaining ground rapidly in the
ECUSA. However, for some groups such as Episcopalians United and First
Promise, these practices represent a very clear issue which truly reveals
the apostasy of the leadership of the Episcopal Church.
Conclusion:
All these "presenting problems" are real problems and real issues but they
are presenting problems. They are the tips of the iceberg. And they point
to major change going on in the ECUSA during this century.
There has been a moving away from the concept and understanding of GOD as
the transcendent Holy One who by grace is immanent in his creation and thus
known by us, to the concept and understanding of God as primarily the
Immanent One with only traces of transcendence. With this change from
classical Trinitarian Theism to forms of Panentheism and Pantheism has come
a change in the evaluation of Jesus of Nazareth. Instead of being the
only-begotten Son of the Father who became Man (One Person made known in
two natures, divine and human) he was seen as the Man adopted by God as His
Son. And therefore the nature of man and of his salvation has been changed
from a being saved out of this evil age into the transcendent and future
kingdom of God to being saved within this world and age to work for peace
and justice (as the use of the "baptismal covenant" amply illustrates). At
the same time the Holy Scriptures have ceased to be the Word of God written
and have become collections of people's experience of religion and of God
(colored by patriarchalism and sexism). Religion is based, therefore,
primarily on Experience, that of yesterday together with that of today.
Any new Province for America supported by overseas Primates will surely
need to recover the classic Anglican Way with its belief and trust in the
living God, the Holy Trinity, and with its Scriptures intact and with its
historic Formularies in place, and with a commitment to biblical faith and
morality. Beginning a new Province with the present canons on marriage,
ordination and liturgy and treating the 1979 prayer book as if it were
truly the B.C.P. with a genuine Ordinal will be major mistake and tragedy!
Peter Toon, ptoon@ont.com