| What
forms of daily worship did the Early Church engage in when it was
not under persecution and was able to erect buildings (holy temples
or houses for the Lord) in the cities and towns for such worship in
the fourth century?
The
answer is that the churches in East and West put their major emphasis
upon a Morning Service, around dawn, and an Evening Service, around
sunset. These were called, Morning and Evening Hymns
and their creation made into public services a discipline of morning
and evening prayer that had long been practiced privately by members
of the Church.
In
the new peace that Constantine the Great brought to the Empire,
Christians and Catechumens were encouraged by their pastors to make
attendance at one or both of these daily services a part of their
daily Christian vocation and routine. (Also of course all Christians
were urged to pray without ceasing and to call upon the Name of
the Lord, at dawn, at the third, sixth & ninth hours and at
sunset wherever they were and if possible with their brethren and
sisters in the Lord.)
At
the Morning and Evening Hymns the local bishop, presbyters
and deacons, were always present (when in town) and they were joined
by young men in training for the ordained ministry, monks and nuns
as well as many church members. Although we may call these services
Mattins and Evensong, they were different in structure and content
to the services we know by these names from The Book of Common
Prayer or from the Breviary.
The
basic content was three fold --- selected Psalms, Canticles and
Litanies (ordered prayer). At this early stage of the development
of the Daily Offices there were no readings from the Bible as Lessons
(yet of course there was much Bible reading and teaching at other
times in the week for church members and catechumens).
The
Psalms and Canticles were sung heartily and the responses in the
Litany were also made vigorously. And different parts of the service
were sung or recited in different parts of the church building with
the participants processing from one part to the other led by the
clergy.
Special
attention was also paid to the lighting of the oil lamps in the
Evening with thanksgiving being offered to the Lord for light.
The
Bishop blessed separately the Catechumens (in preparation for church
membership) and the faithful (the baptized and confirmed members).
The
Morning and Evening Services were joyful and celebratory with rich
use of music, ceremony, visual effect and congregational participation.
Yet the celebration was not in the sense of elevating humanity but
rather of praising the Lord. Since Psalm 51 was one of the set psalms
for each day there was no diminishing of the reality of sin!
At
this stage the Celebration of a daily Eucharist was rare and if
there
was a daily receiving of Holy Communion it was often from the reserved
Sacrament. Certainly there was always the Eucharist on the Lords
Day and
on special Feast Days but in this period (unlike the Middle Ages
in the
West) it had not become a daily rite.
Later
on, as Monasticism became a major component in Christianity, what
we may call the Peoples Daily Services of Hymns
at the city and town churches began to change as they were adapted
to the Daily Offices of the Monks and Religious. Later these services
disappeared in most places as they were replaced by the more austere
and demanding Daily Offices of monasticism.
At
the Reformation when Archbishop Cranmer sought to simplify the Daily
Offices for the use of clergy and laity and make them into two rather
than seven or more services, what he simplified was not the original
Peoples Services from the Early Church (of which he had very
little information and
detail) but the medieval services/offices of the monks and religious.
Thus the Anglican pattern of Daily Morning and Evening Prayer in
the classic Book of Common Prayer belongs much more
to the disciplined, meditatory and western monastic development
of the Early Church Daily Services than to the celebratory style
of Daily Worship in terms of Morning and Evening Hymns of the fourth
century.
It
is difficult to find any form of daily worship in the West today
that appears to be similar to that common in the Early Church in
the age of Constantine the Great. Neither Taize nor the best charismatic
services seem to fit. I am told that in parts of Africa Christian
congregations, whilst they wait for the arrival of their bishop,
engage for long periods of time in hymns and praying in a ordered
yet also spontaneous way. Maybe this practice is like unto the Morning
and Evening Hymns of antiquity.
Application:
I,
for one, see possibilities in the reviving of the patristic Morning
and Evening Hymns which would minister well, I think, to many
modern western Christians and potential Christians who find the
more disciplined and cerebral emphases of the traditional Daily
Offices difficult to enter into to. I can see the central service
at a church or cathedral being available by digital & video
means in homes and offices for those who cannot be present at the
central sanctuary.
Lets
face it we need a form of worship which attracts modern persons
who believe/want to be believe, which engages their feelings and
emotions, and which helps them move from a state of indifference
or not quite sure about faith to one of attending unto God, his
name and his salvation. They need easily digestible but wholesome
food for mind and heart and they want it in a celebratory kind of
way.
On
the other hand, we need, for a minority, a form of worship which
presupposes a measure of commitment and consecration with the ability
to be attentive and thoughtful. Worship for those who are mature
and wish to be mature and constant in their relation with God. And
the BCP supplies this.
Maybe
or even certainly -- we need both types of daily worship
in order to revive Anglicanism in the West in this new millennium.
We need to find ways to revive the fourth century pattern and we
ought to hold on to the classical Anglican pattern. And maybe some
people will graduate from the one to the other as they mature in
the Faith. That which was common in the fourth century would be
easiest to revive in Cathedrals and Large City Churches where there
are sufficient clergy who could gladly be involved daily. And these
holy places are big enough to make space for the offering of the
regular Anglican Daily Offices as well in an adjoining chapel.
Certainly
there is a real need for daily services where a quorum (not necessarily
the same people daily) prays on behalf of the whole people, and
from where, through modern digital means, others can share in the
offering of the sacrifice of prayer and praise at the central sanctuary.
|