|
|
The Church's Authority in Discipline |
|
Article XXXIV OF THE TRADITIONS
OF THE CHURCH[1] It
is not necessary that traditions and ceremonies be in all places one,
or utterly like; for at all times they have been divers, and may be
changed according to the diversity of countries, times, and mens
manners, so that nothing be ordained against Gods Word.
Whosoever through his private judgement, willingly and purposely,
doth openly break the traditions and ceremonies of the Church, which
be not repugnant to the Word of God, and be ordained and approved by
common authority, ought to be rebuked openly (that other may fear to
do the like,) as he that offendeth against the common order of the Church,
and hurteth the authority of the Magistrate, and woundeth the consciences
of the weak brethren. Every
particular or national Church hath authority to ordain, change, and
abolish ceremonies or rites of the Church ordained only by mans
authority, so that all things be done to edifying. This
Article asserts the liberty of National Churches to ordain,
change, and abolish ceremonies or rites, and at the same time
condemns any individual who willingly, purposely, and openly
breaks the traditions and ceremonies of the Church.
It will be observed that the liberty of a National Church is
limited to the variation of rites and ceremonies ordained only
by mans authority; it cannot ordain anything that
is contrary to God's Word written.[2] The
basis of the right to change custom is the historical fact that customs
have varied in the past. Local
branches of the Catholic Church in various places developed, often unconsciously,
customary ways of worship, and formulated rules for the guidance of
their members. Such customs and rules varied from place to
place, and were recognized and approved by many of the highest authorities
in the Church. For instance,
a ceremonial feet‑washing (the Pedilavitim) accompanied
Baptism in the Gallican Church and in Milan, but was not practised in
Spain or in Rome.[3] Many non‑Roman customs and usages were
practised in the early Celtic Church.[4] The Eucharist was celebrated on Wednesdays
and Fridays in Africa and in Jerusalem but not in Rome.[5] Saturday was observed as a day of fasting in
Rome and North Africa but not in Milan.[6] St. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan (375‑397
A.D.) advised St. Augustine to conform to local customs: When
I am here (in Milan) I do not fast on Saturday; but when I am at Rome
I do: whatever Church you may come to, conform to its custom if you
would avoid either giving or receiving offence.[7] It
is evident, therefore, that in the Primitive Church absolute uniformity
in rites and ceremonies was not considered desirable or essential. But as the influence of the Church of Rome
spread, she tried to bring all local customs into conformity with the
Roman customs. Article XXXIV
is a reply to the Council of Trents refusal to recognize National
Churches, and its insistence on uniformity of doctrine, ceremonial,
and discipline. [1]The first paragraph of this
Article was derived from the fifth of the Thirteen Articles (1538),
the word times being added in 1563 for more comprehensiveness. The last paragraph was also added in 1563. [2]Article XX. [3]Duchesne, Christian Worship,
its Origin & Evolution, p. 326. [4]Cf. W. G. Wilson, Church Teaching,
p. 8 ff. for a brief summary. [5]Duchesne, Op. cit., p. 230. [6]Ibid. p. 231. [7]Ep., 54. |
|