The Church's Authority in Doctrine
PREVIOUS 109 NEXT

Title
Contents
Preface
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C



Site Search:

powered by
FreeFind

Copyright & Credit

Many Councils have been held, but not all of the them are recognized as ‘General Councils’. In practice, ‘the ecumenicity of a Council depends on the after reception of its decisions by the whole Church.[1]  Thus', the first Council of Nicaea (325) received recognition as ‘General’ because its decisions received general approval, but the Council of Arminium did not.  The Roman Church recognizes eighteen Councils as ‘General’ or Ecumenical, but most of them (like Trent) were purely Roman Councils and not strictly ecumenical. The Anglican Communion only recognizes the first six Councils ‘which were allowed and received of all men’,[2] and the Greek Orthodox Church accepts only the first seven (including Nicaea II) as ecumenical.  Article XXI was composed by the English Reformers in 1552, and was then intended as an explicit declaration that the Anglican Church would not be bound by the decisions of the Council of Trent.

The purpose of General Councils has been to state the Church’s belief on disputed questions, and to determine matters of discipline and order.  The qualification for this task is not that the members of a Council are the elected delegates of the churches, but that they should be men ‘governed with the Spirit and Word of God’.  The supreme requisite is a sincere desire to know and do the divine will: ‘If any man willeth to do His will, he shall know of the teaching, whether it be of God’.[3]  Spiritual things are spiritually judged, and possession of the Spirit is the condition for discerning ‘the deep things of God’.  To have the mind of Christ is for St. Paul the one way of knowing the saving truth which is in Him.[4]  As the history of the Councils fully shows, these qualities were not prominent in their proceedings, which were ruled too often by political intrigue and party interests.  Composed as they were of fallible men, Councils ‘may err, and have erred. . . wherefore things ordained by them as necessary to salvation have neither strength nor authority, unless it may be declared that they be taken out of Holy Scripture.’  We regard as errors the decrees of the second Council of Nicaea (A.D. 787) which sanctioned the adoration of images; that of the Council of Constance (A.D. 1414) withholding the cup from the laity in the Holy Communion; that of the Lateran Council (A.D. 1215), defining the doctrine of Transubstantiation; the belief in Purgatory drawn up by the Council of Florence (A.D. 1439); and the decrees of the Vatican Councils of 1869 (which declared Papal Infallibility), 1854 (declared Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary), and 1950 (declared the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary).  None of these dogmas satisfy St. Vincent’s Canon as having been believed and taught ‘everywhere, always, and by all’.


 



[1]E. J. Bicknell, Introduction to the Thirty-nine Articles, p. 272.

[2]Homily Against Peril of Idolatry, cf. Article XXXV.

[3]Jn. 7:17.

[4]1 Cor. 2:10-16.

PREVIOUS 109 NEXT