|
|
The Scriptures and Creeds |
|
The first General Council (summoned
by the Emperor Constantine) opened on 19th June, 325, at Nicaea.[1] The 318 Bishops present issued a Creed designed
to refute the errors of Arius, presbyter of Alexandria, who denied the
co‑eternity and co‑equality of the Son with the Father. It was probably a revised version of an earlier
Baptismal Creed[2]
into which they inserted anti‑Arian clauses which declared that
the Son is Very God of Very God, begotten not made, Being of one
substance with the Father. The
Creed issued by the Council of Nicaea (technically designated by the
letter N) was not, however, identically the same as our Nicene Creed.[3] In fact, some scholars have denied any connection
between the two, and prefer to call our Creed the Constantinopolitan
Creed. It is true that
the second General Council held at Constantinople in 381 issued a Creed
almost verbally identical with our Nicene Creed.[4] But it has been pointed out that the Council
of Constantinople did not conceive of itself as manufacturing
a new Creed,[5]
and that the description the faith of Nicaea in the fourth
century could equally well be used of a Creed, local or otherwise,
which was patently Nicene in its general character while differing from
N in much of its language.[6] Whoever may have been the original author of
the present text of our Nicene Creed,[7]
it was promulgated by the Council of Constantinople as the faith
of the Nicene fathers but that faith set forth in a form better
adapted than N for dealing with the heresies of the hour.[8] It was also received and endorsed by the fourth
General Council at Chalcedon in 451.
It thus comes to us as a Conciliar Creed possessing the full
authority of the Undivided Church. The origin and date of the Athanasian Creed
has been the subject of much controversy and speculation.[9] Scholars are agreed that Athanasius did not
write it,[10] but
are less certain as to the identity of the actual author. It was probably written in the 5th or 6th century,
and is more a Canticle or Hymn than a Creed. The Orthodox Church of the East has never formally accepted it,
and it does not possess the same oecumenical authority as the Nicene
and Apostles Creeds. The
American Church has omitted use of the Quicunque Vult (as
it is commonly called), and its use is optional in the Irish and Canadian
Churches. It is a theological statement designed to protect the Faith against
heretical views concerning the Trinity, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. For over a thousand years the Baptismal Creed of Western Christendom has been that which is commonly called the Apostles Creed. Though not written by the Apostles, it summarizes the Apostolic teaching.[11] In its present form it was used in Gaul c. A.D. 750 but most of its substance can be traced back to a Baptismal Creed used in the Roman Church about the middle of the second century. [1]J. N. D. Kelly, Early
Christian Creeds, 1950, p. 211. [2]J. N. D. Kelly, Op.
cit., p. 229 f. [3]For instance, it
ended with the words I believe in the Holy Ghost. [4]With the notable
omission, of course, of the Filioque clause (cf. Article V), and stated
throughout in the plural (Baptismal Creeds, as expressing the personal
faith of an individual were naturally in the singular, I believe;
but Conciliar Creeds as expressing the faith of an assembled body
were naturally in the plural, We believe...). [5]J. N. D. Kelly, Op.
cit., p. 325. The same writer
points out (p. 307 f.) that none of the various Synods that met between
381 and 451 make any reference to a Constantinopolitan Creed. [6]J. N. D. Kelly, Op.
cit., p. 323. [7]For a full discussion
of the views of various scholars, Ibid. p. 296 ff. [8]J. N. D. Kelly, Op.
cit., p. 331. [9]For a summary of
the various theories consult Liturgy and Worship, Ed. W. K. Lowther
Clarke, 1943, p. 280 ff. [10]It was written in
Latin, but Athanasius wrote in Greek. [11]A detailed exposition
of the Apostles Creed is given by W. G. Wilson in Church Teaching,
A Handbook for Members of the Church of Ireland, 1954, pp. 38-59. |
|